|
Sub-Spaced.com > Art > MA MMID |
|
Michael
Punt Presentation |
Darren Stevens |
|
Friday 28th
March 2003 |
|
Dynamic
Space: Interactive Art in Large-Scale Public Environments Ð Miroslaw Rogala
This is a case study
report following the planning and installation of an interactive installation
in a busy public park in Chicago. The interactive installation being
ÔElectronic Garden/NatuRealizationÕ, 1996.
The case
study highlights the general issues related to the installation covering a six
month period of public presentation and presents conclusions on contemporary
interactive participatory artworks.
The case
study follows a hypothesis of postulating creative interactive artworks as an
intellectual/philosophical investigation into the processes of creation and
participation in technological media arts. The study is set with a context of
Ôthe impact of new technologies on urban space, industrial behaviour and art
practice since 1910Õ and within Ôthe role of randomness and predictability in
the movement of people through public spacesÕ.
The paper
begins by highlighting Hugo MunsterbergÕs argument detailing new technological
and urban societies of the 20th century are providing new
temporalities and spatialityÕs which demand a new form of cooperation and goes
on to include Frank Popper claims of the transition of emphasis from the art
object/artist to that of the new active role of spectator involvement. Rogala
also incorporates Brenda LaurelÕs statement, citing user interfaces and the
balance of power between the user, the artwork and the artist, in order to
propose that the term ÔspectatorÕ is presently inadequate and that more
descriptive terms such as Ôuser, collaborator or creatorÕ are required today to
better formulate the position of the spectators/participants/interactors to the
artwork. These statements all highlight a differing and collaborative
relationship art and itÕs viewers of today to the traditional concept of art as
separate to the viewer.
Following
the planning and installation of the interactive artwork ÔElectronic
Garden/NatuRealizationÕ, the paper presents both pre and post installation
reports and findings.
Pre-installation
as the following of a criteria of public involvement in planning, research,
history and recordings at all stages of the installations development,
highlighting a greater public/artist collaboration issue in this work and
public art.
Post-installation
reporting on inherent aspects of public interaction citing context, movement,
duration, location and behaviour, and giving specific examples of findings from
public interaction.
The case
study emphasises the relevance of the physical body to interaction and
participation in public artworks and follows on with conclusions and
explanations for contemporary artwork and directions, utilising EcoÕs concepts
of Ôopen worksÕ or Ôworks in movementÕ Ð participation being the active element
in bringing the work to provisional completion. Rogala also indicates a linkage
to architecture in the form of space, behaviour of the body and the
implications of interactive systems on spatial experience.
In focusing
on the issue of modern day research through both Deleuze and Bauer in mind and
body being intimately connected, Rogala illustrates a greater level of
importance to the advancement of physical interactions in space.
In focusing
on the traditional definition of space (height, width and depth) and in view to
physics, engineering and architecture, the case study emphasises the need for a
redefinition of space as an empty extension. With use of Popper, Rogala
indicates that physical space surrounding an artwork bears a significant level
of importance to communication of consciousness through the artwork and hence
itÕs environment.
In view to
technologies and interaction, Rogala summaries the technologies of radio and
the internet to illustrate the move from passive receiver to the active
receiver/broadcaster. The move from singular broadcaster to multiple
broadcaster, participation of the spectator. Rogala also gives an indication of
the usage of cooperative spectator interaction technologies within the theme
park industries against the emphasis of individuality within interactive
television-based games.
In view to
the historical aspect of technological development in interactive art, there
has been attempts to humanise the interface between user and system to allow
for greater reciprocal dialogue. New interpretations of the art object in view
to the spectator have been provided following works such as Umberto EcoÕs
ÔOpera ApertoÕ. The role of the artist has changed from that of external
commentary of society to that internal societal change.
New avenues
for interactive art are now possible, not only between participants and device,
but between participants and participants and creators.